• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

LPDD

  • Top Resources
    • What’s New
  • Model Laws
  • Pathways
    • 1. Context
    • 2. Cross-Cutting Approaches to Reducing Emissions
    • 3. Energy Efficiency, Conservation, and Fuel Switching in Buildings and Industry
    • 4. Energy Efficiency, Conservation, and Fuel Switching in Transportation
    • 5. Electricity Decarbonization
    • 6. Fuel Decarbonization
    • 7. Carbon Capture and Negative Emissions
    • 8. Non-Carbon Dioxide Climate Pollutants
  • Search
  • About
    • Our Team
    • In the News and Events
    • Glossary
  • Get Involved
    • Get Involved: Drafting
    • Get Involved: Peer Review
    • Get Involved: Outreach
    • Get Involved: Law Schools

LPDD January Newsletter

January 15, 2021
On the Recent Georgia Run-Off Election
 
The LPDD team is encouraged by the results of the recent Georgia runoff elections, and what they mean for the prospects of climate legislation nationally, as well as for cabinet and judicial appointments under the Biden Administration. We also acknowledge that strong federal support for climate action often raises the ambition level of states and localities. At this momentous time, we renew our call to lawyers and law firms to participate in the LPDD project, crafting the type of strong model legislation that every level of government in the United States will be calling for in the years ahead. Contact us to get involved here. 
 
New Model Laws from the LPDD Team

Since the last newsletter update, the LPDD team has published three new model laws. They are listed below:

  • Model State Statute Providing Rebates for Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles and Hydrogen Refueling Stations: This model statute would offer state rebates for the purchase of new hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, which would be available for a ten year period.  In addition, the model statute would provide state support for the development of a network of equitably located hydrogen refueling stations, with preference given to locations along heavily traveled corridors. The statute does not specify the amount of either the vehicle rebate or the network development subsidy, since the legislature of the enacting state is best suited to fix those amounts in light of the state’s particular fiscal circumstances and sources of available funding. Under the model statute, the state would fund the vehicle rebates and network development subsidies each year for ten years, devoting 4% of the state’s gasoline excise tax, generally known as the Motor Fuels Tax, or its alternative fuels tax, to doing so.
  • Model Local Resolution Supporting a Circular Economy: This model resolution is intended to assist local governments in initiating deliberate steps along the path towards a circular economy.  Most cities and towns already engage in one or more practices that are considered circular – actions such as composting yard waste, recovering electronic waste products, banning or imposing fees on single use plastic bags, considering product lifespan in procurement decisions, and so on.  This model resolution sets out a general commitment to a transition to a circular economy, designates a lead department or official, calls for an initial assessment of resource and waste in-flow and out-flow and for a more comprehensive emissions analysis, encourages support for and exploration of business and job creation opportunities, and provides for a report on initial activities and consideration of follow up steps and new policies after the resolution has been in place for one year. It is accompanied by a memorandum that explains potential local actions in support of a circular economy in more detail.
  • Model Federal Arctic Shipping Tax Act. As thinning polar sea ice opens new Arctic shipping routes, voyages through Arctic waters will emit GHGs and other pollutants directly into the Arctic environment and disturb the sea-ice cover, reducing the albedo effect and thus perpetuating and accelerating dangerous cycles of global warming through positive feedback loops. This proposed Arctic Shipping Tax Act would impose a tax on the greenhouse gas content of fossil fuels used by commercial shipping vessels engaged in international shipping in Arctic Circle waters in the thirty days prior to calling at a United States port. The amount of the tax is calculated as the greenhouse gas content of the covered fuel used multiplied by the carbon tax rate, rising from $10 to $30 over a ten year period. The Bill also sets out provisions relating to enforcement, including recordkeeping and penalties.

Highlighted New External Resources

LPDD.org is being continually updated with new, external legal resources. Below is a brief selection of recently added resources of special interest.
HFC Cuts in COVID Relief Bill: In the recent COVID relief bill, Congress included specific measures for the reduction of hydrofluorocarbon emission. The bill effectively requires American companies to comply with the 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, and reduce production and consumption of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) to about 15% of 2012 levels by 2036.
Massachusetts 2050 Decarbonization Roadmap: Under the framework of Massachusetts’ Global Warming Solutions Act, Massachusetts has committed to achieving Net Zero GHG emissions by 2050. Released last month, this 2050 Decarbonization Roadmap Study was designed to support the Commonwealth in this goal. The study comprised four sector-specific analyses focused on buildings, transportation, non-energy emissions, and the carbon sequestration potential of Massachusetts’ natural and working lands, as well as a separate economic and health impact analysis. The study attracted particular attention for setting the goal of phasing out the sale of gas-powered vehicles in Massachusetts by 2035. The Commonwealth thereby joins California and New Jersey among first-mover states with that target.
Massachusetts S.2995: Massachusetts also recently passed a major piece of climate legislation through its legislature, S.2995. The Act includes greenhouse gas reduction targets of 50 percent by 2030, 75 percent by 2040, and net-zero by 2050, along with a process for setting more sector-specific targets. Notably, the bill would codify environmental justice definitions into state law, strengthening environmental protections for vulnerable, typically low income, communities of color. The bill would also increase the requirements for offshore wind energy procurement to 5,600 megawatts; raise the state’s renewable energy requirement to 40% by 2030; and require emission reduction goals for MassSave, the state’s energy efficiency program. Finally, the bill codifies a stretch code that would allow localities, in effect, to ban the use of natural gas in buildings (removing a hurdle that thwarted Brookline’s attempt to ban natural gas in new buildings last year). At the time of this writing, it is unclear whether Governor Baker will veto the bill.
Hawaii’s Finalized Performance-Based Ratemaking Framework: Culminating a process that began in 2018 with Senate Bill 2939, this past month Hawaii concluded a process instituting Performance-Based Ratemaking (PBR) with its utilities. On December 23, 2020, the Commission issued Decision and Order No. 37507 establishing a PBR Framework to reform Hawaiian Electric’s business model to the transition away from traditional cost-of-service regulation, under which rates are driven by system costs, towards a system that rewards the utility for exemplary performance. Financial rewards for exemplary performance in key areas will drive improvements in the integration of renewable energy into the utility’s system, increase customer choice, and accelerate the achievement of the State’s clean energy goals. An expedited pilot process will support the development of innovative new projects and service offerings, while encouraging collaboration between Hawaiian Electric and local businesses. This Order makes Hawaii one of the first states in the country to transition away from traditional ratemaking models, and to incentivize utilities to lead the energy transition instead.

Report, Building a New Grid Without New Legislation: A Path to Revitalizing Federal Transmission Authorities: Published last month, this report from the Institute for Policy Integrity holds that, in the absence of legislation, critical long-distance transmission can be developed by applying existing federal legal authorities. New long-distance, high-voltage transmission lines will be vital if the United States is to deploy enough renewable generation capacity to decarbonize the power sector and to integrate it cost-effectively, as well as electrify our economy in time to meet the targets established in the Paris Agreement. Because Congress may not take timely action to remove barriers to these power lines, this paper seeks to explain steps that the federal government—particularly from within the US Department of Energy (DOE) and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) — could take to facilitate development of a future grid that is capable of supporting a reliable, affordable, and increasingly zero-carbon power sector. Acknowledging that state siting requirements may prove an obstacle to developing an efficient, national transmission grid, this paper examines legal authorities already available to DOE and FERC to develop the interstate transmission capacity crucial to the energy transition.

Pathway Highlight: Equitable Access to Community Renewables. As states, utilities, and public service commissions have pushed forward community solar programs and other shared renewables models, many jurisdictions over the last several years have seen an opportunity to advance community energy into the low-and moderate-income (LMI) market. In this pathway, we highlight growing efforts to achieve social equity goals while advancing local clean energy by subscribing LMI customers a tranche or the entirety of community energy projects, in effect reducing customer solicitation costs for projects, sharing that and other savings with LMI customers, and giving projects a long-term stable subscriber base.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • News
  • Top Resources

Archives

  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
Creation of the site was generously supported by the Andrew Sabin Family Foundation.
© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

Laws vary considerably from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The model legal documents on this website are not specific to any jurisdiction. They should be viewed solely as a starting point for legislators, policymakers and interested stakeholders, and would need to be adapted and modified to the particularities of local, county, state, federal and other legal systems in consultation with an attorney licensed to practice and experienced in the drafting and enactment of legislation in that jurisdiction.

Made with by Satellite Jones