• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

LPDD

  • Top Resources
    • What’s New
  • Model Laws
  • Pathways
    • 1. Context
    • 2. Cross-Cutting Approaches to Reducing Emissions
    • 3. Energy Efficiency, Conservation, and Fuel Switching in Buildings and Industry
    • 4. Energy Efficiency, Conservation, and Fuel Switching in Transportation
    • 5. Electricity Decarbonization
    • 6. Fuel Decarbonization
    • 7. Carbon Capture and Negative Emissions
    • 8. Non-Carbon Dioxide Climate Pollutants
  • Search
  • About
    • Our Team
    • In the News and Events
    • Glossary
  • Get Involved
    • Get Involved: Drafting
    • Get Involved: Peer Review
    • Get Involved: Outreach
    • Get Involved: Law Schools

New LPDD Model Curbside EV Charging and Reserved Parking Ordinance

October 15, 2020

We’re proud to announce the publication of a new LPDD model law addressing the installation of curbside EV chargers and reserved parking in residential areas. In addition to other contributors who wish to remain anonymous, James Goldberg provided drafting on this model law, and Kim Faith provided peer review. It is available to view here.

Excerpted from the introductory memorandum to the model law:

Electric vehicle owners rely primarily on charging their vehicles at home on a daily basis. Even Tesla, which has installed a wide commercial charging network, expects that residential charging will remain dominant. However, in some residential neighborhoods, residents do not have the ability to install a charger on their property in conformity with zoning, because there is no room for a garage and they have to park on the street, or the construction of a garage or parking area would be prohibitively expensive. A solution to this barrier to home charging would be to permit homeowners to install chargers at street curbs and to have exclusive access to parking beside those stations for nightly recharging of registered EVs.

The model ordinance allowing curbside charging is similar to, but differs significantly from, previously tested solutions. Philadelphia and Berkeley instituted test pilot programs to permit the installation of a charging station adjacent to the public right of way in front of a residence, but did not assure exclusive daily access for recharging. These programs have not been successful:  Philadelphia is ending its program, and Berkeley has been asked to grant only several dozen permits over several years. The omission from these programs of provisions allowing owners to reserve access to the charger overnight made them unattractive to the homeowner, who is responsible for the payment of all costs of the charger’s installation (which may be $2,500 or more). Given that expenditure, and in light of the fact that homeowners who build garages or driveways install a curb cut that takes away one street parking space in perpetuity, 24/7, the model ordinance reserves the charger for the homeowner at night. In most other respects it is modeled on one enacted by New Orleans in late 2017.

The program that would be established under the ordinance would permit homeowners to install one charger adjacent to the public right-of-way in front of their residence if they do not have a garage or driveway, in residential districts, and to grant the residents exclusive access to the parking space adjacent to the charger from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m.  The space would be available for use by others during daytime hours. Given that the impact on parking is less than building a garage or driveway, this solution would be preferable even where the construction of a garage or driveway would be permitted by zoning laws.

The permits would be limited to residents of single-family and two-family residences because they are likely to have sufficient street frontage to accommodate a charger and a reserved space for each unit. Multiple-unit residences may have insufficient street frontage to accommodate a charger and a reserved space for each unit; even if they did, allocating spaces closest to the building entrance could lead to conflict and resentment; and, in any event, multiple-unit residences are more likely to be in denser neighborhoods with better access to public transportation alternatives. 

 

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • News
  • Top Resources

Archives

  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
Creation of the site was generously supported by the Andrew Sabin Family Foundation.
© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

Laws vary considerably from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The model legal documents on this website are not specific to any jurisdiction. They should be viewed solely as a starting point for legislators, policymakers and interested stakeholders, and would need to be adapted and modified to the particularities of local, county, state, federal and other legal systems in consultation with an attorney licensed to practice and experienced in the drafting and enactment of legislation in that jurisdiction.

Made with by Satellite Jones